Just curious. Many DVD movies are now "enhanced for 16:9". BUT, some are not... My question for some DVD techno-maven is: say you're a technical guy at a DVD mastering place and the boss says: "fix this non anamorphic, widescreen to be "enhanced for 16:9". Well, is that a BIG messy job that costs a LOT of money, or is that like a few keystrokes on a special mastering machine? Or a little hard to do, but just a days work?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I wish ALL the (over 1.77 aspect ratio) DVDs would be enhanced. Just wonder how big a deal it is for the producers to MAKE them that way?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Enhanced DVD: what work is involved in changing a DVD digital master from 'normal 4:3 to "ENHANCED" - Elizabeth 05:37:39 09/11/01 (5)
- Somewhat related... - Victor Khomenko 05:48:30 09/11/01 (4)
- "Full Frame" is sometimes interesting as widescreen" is from masked 4:3 original - Elizabeth 05:54:40 09/12/01 (3)
- "Full Frame" is sometimes masked 4:3 original"- yes it is here's why... - Dman 12:44:55 09/16/01 (2)
- Re: "Full Frame" is sometimes masked 4:3 original"- yes it is here's why... - Damonx 19:38:44 09/25/01 (1)
- Re: "Full Frame" is sometimes masked 4:3 original"- yes it is here's why... - Doug Schneider 15:23:15 09/28/01 (0)