In Reply to: Re: Nakamichi AV-10 comparable with recievers costing much more? posted by Brett on April 30, 1999 at 09:20:03:
Not to be a chump, but you get what you pay for. Since the $886 cost of your NAK suggests that you received one of the many refurbished units out in the market, I only hope you wish you had bought the unit from an authorized dealer when and if the receiver decides to crash. In addition to defining yourself as a cheepskate, your decesion to shop mail order also qualifys you as one among many who are killing hi-end retail audio. Despite my railing, I hope you have no problems with your purchase. In two channel audio and surround, the Nak AV 10 is truly a wonderful product.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Nakamichi AV-10 comparable with recievers costing much more? - John 22:14:17 05/02/99 (1)
- Re: Nakamichi AV-10 comparable with recievers costing much more? - Brett 15:35:48 05/11/99 (0)