I don't understand something. Can you smart folks set me on the right track?What I've read seems to say this:
(1) Most DVD players output a non-progressive scan signal, which is basically an interlaced signal, albeit with more lines of resolution.
(2) Progressive scan players output a non-interlaced signal, making an outboard line doubler uninteresting for DVD playback.
(3) Progressive scan players go a long way to eliminating the jaggies in output images.
(4) A non-progressive scan DVD player with an outboard line doubler will improve the resulting image, but not as much as a progressive scan player.Are these points correct? If so, I fear that my non-progressive scan DVD player has become another betamax. :-{
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Progressive Scan vs. Line Doubler - Confused 21:16:12 03/20/01 (1)
- Re: Progressive Scan vs. Line Doubler - ChuckMoe 22:06:12 03/20/01 (0)