In Reply to: Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... posted by CarlEber on December 18, 2001 at 17:53:17:
***...to even attempt to answer the question of why 2.35:1 is so overused when producing DVD's. All movie producers, studio executives, etc., know that widescreen televisions are not 2.35:1, and surely they must know that 35mm Kodak (or any other) film frames shot with Panaflex motion picture cameras is NOT "2.35:1", but is much closer to (if not exactly) "16:9", or anywhere between 1.75:1 and 1.85 or even .95, to 1 (and in some cases is even close to 1.33:1). THAT'S THE WHOLE REASON THE "16:9" ASPECT FOR TELEVISION WAS CONCEIVED IN THE FIRST PLACE...TO BETTER MATCH THE ASPECT RATIO OF 35mm MOTION PICTURES.
SO I ASK AGAIN...WHY CROP OFF THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF A 35mm NEGATIVE/PRINT just to make it a slender 2.35:1, and then put in on a DVD that will play on a 16:9 tv set?***Answering your question would put an end to your floundering about. No one wants to be deprived of your entertaining buffoonery.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... - Rich 05:35:59 12/19/01 (1)
- <shrug> (nt) - CarlEber 19:17:59 12/19/01 (0)