In Reply to: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? posted by CarlEber on December 17, 2001 at 20:07:50:
Will hereby be given to the cinematographer of The Phantom Menace, David Tattersall:"The Phantom Menace was produced in anamorphic (2.4:1 aspect ratio) format, to provide a feeling of cinematic scope. Tattersall says he prefers the optical quality of an anamorphic final show print to the Super 35 format, which uses spherical lenses and a smaller negative area."
Read the whole article:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/images/spring99/phantom.shtmlSuppose this will end the discussion?
Best,
Thom
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The Final Word: - Thom P 02:14:53 12/20/01 (5)
- Re: The Final Word: - CarlEber 04:12:30 12/20/01 (4)
- Re: The Final Word: - Rich 17:06:09 12/22/01 (3)
- Not quite - CarlEber 02:55:33 12/23/01 (2)
- Tatersall's reply... - Rich 11:42:47 12/23/01 (1)
- In yur dreams Morgan... - CarlEber 20:56:05 12/24/01 (0)