In Reply to: Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? posted by Joe S on December 21, 2001 at 11:29:27:
"A couple of evenings is not nearly long enough."You are very generous (it must be the holiday season, eigh?)...I didn't want to appear rude, so I only asked for a couple of evenings, and hoped for the best...
"I'd LOVE to send her over. But only if you'd promise to keep her."
I admit, this is very intrigueing. If she'd agree that easily to the move, this could be good news. I find that the submissive type can be very satisfying, and I (unlike you) can't afford a trophy wife just yet (and I'd rather spend what I do have on audio, of course). Submissive yet intelligent...has a nice ring to it. Does she have her own credit cards, what is the maximum credit limit of the best one, and would you still get the bill?? Do younger passionate men who like to yell a lot, turn her on?? Does she like to be videotaped??
"I guess it's brian and not Brian right?"
In his case, lower case isn't low enough. Even lower case letters are wasted on his name...his name is probably best uttered with flatulence. And speaking of...
"Were those covered in particle or wave theory?"
Actually photons are thought to behave as both, but then you knew that didn't you? It's a shame you took that one so literally; it was meant more as a joke; perhaps if you read it again you might get it. Sorry if it was over your head. I'll try harder next time...
"I can call you Carl can't I, or would you prefer Mr. Eber?"
Actually I'm thinking of changing my name to Puff Daddy, or Pimpbot or sumthin...or perhaps even "joe"...btw, I thought you were committed to using upper case letters for proper names. Don't tell me you're going to be inconsistent...please say it ain't so!
"And where do you get these "entity" stamps on the forehead you mentioned?"
Oh, forgive me, I left that part out. Have you ever been to Six Flags or Disneyworld? They usually stamp your wrist or the back of your hand, but I'm sure if you got down on your knees they'd realize what you wanted, and may even stamp your forehead too...Sometimes this works, sometimes not...or so I've been told.
"can you possibly help me with puzzler I just havn't been able to crack?"
Perhaps if you try harder to answer my own "puzzler", I'll try harder than: I thought one walks on their hands...what is this "feet" you speak of? Oh, it could be that people around here (Antarctica) all walk on their hands, because otherwise we'd all be upside down (it's the bottom of the world and all). Are you from the northern hemisphere? It just may be that you've evolved differently than we have, I dunno.
Happy Holidays, cARL
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - CarlEber 02:39:17 12/23/01 (22)
- Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Joe S 10:31:57 12/23/01 (21)
- wah wah wah..... - CarlEber 21:08:10 12/24/01 (20)
- wah? wah? wah? - Joe S 11:29:32 12/25/01 (19)
- Uh huh... - CarlEber 03:28:49 12/27/01 (18)
- Rest assured Carl... - Joe S 13:35:30 12/27/01 (15)
- Re: Rest assured Joe... - CarlEber 19:04:19 12/30/01 (14)
- Puking in Tennessee... - Joe S 09:02:14 12/31/01 (13)
- Oh my, you're turning green Joe... - CarlEber 19:44:10 12/31/01 (12)
- Carl, what is a "reflecting/wildlife lake" ? (nt) - Iguana Man 11:49:08 01/02/02 (5)
- A place where iguana's achieve... - CarlEber 20:11:01 01/02/02 (2)
- Actually, for male iguanas, simultaneous "o's" are easy... - Iguana Man 04:22:49 01/03/02 (1)
- More than I needed to know...and try the dictionary (nt) - CarlEber 19:36:00 01/03/02 (0)
- I think it's a... - Joe S 13:29:03 01/02/02 (1)
- Joe's got pigs on the brain - CarlEber 20:15:15 01/02/02 (0)
- Gosh! I'm impressed Carl. - Joe S 12:05:24 01/01/02 (3)
- Re: Gosh! I'm impressed Carl. - CarlEber 04:26:07 01/02/02 (2)
- Carl..... - Joe S 13:26:01 01/02/02 (1)
- Re: "S"..... - CarlEber 20:17:42 01/02/02 (0)
- Re: Hey! It's f#ckwit Carl! - Jim Willis 07:52:24 01/01/02 (1)
- Re: Hey! It's stinkpit Jimmy! - CarlEber 04:34:31 01/02/02 (0)
- Re: Uh huh... - Rich 06:59:41 12/27/01 (1)
- Re: Uh huh... - CarlEber 19:01:29 12/30/01 (0)