In Reply to: Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? posted by CarlEber on December 23, 2001 at 02:39:17:
Gee cARL, those community college courses must be paying off. That's the largest number of vaguely cogent words I've ever seen you use in a single post. And it only took you two days to compose it too! But one thing, what's the whole brian thing about? More than one of us would like to know. Is he the one that taught you everything you know about home theater? That must have taken all of 12 seconds....And, oh yeah, since you asked again I will answer your orignal puzzler - the reason that you think 2.35 to 1 is so overused in DVDs? Because you're an idiot.
Happy holidays!
joe
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Joe S 10:31:57 12/23/01 (21)
- wah wah wah..... - CarlEber 21:08:10 12/24/01 (20)
- wah? wah? wah? - Joe S 11:29:32 12/25/01 (19)
- Uh huh... - CarlEber 03:28:49 12/27/01 (18)
- Rest assured Carl... - Joe S 13:35:30 12/27/01 (15)
- Re: Rest assured Joe... - CarlEber 19:04:19 12/30/01 (14)
- Puking in Tennessee... - Joe S 09:02:14 12/31/01 (13)
- Oh my, you're turning green Joe... - CarlEber 19:44:10 12/31/01 (12)
- Carl, what is a "reflecting/wildlife lake" ? (nt) - Iguana Man 11:49:08 01/02/02 (5)
- A place where iguana's achieve... - CarlEber 20:11:01 01/02/02 (2)
- Actually, for male iguanas, simultaneous "o's" are easy... - Iguana Man 04:22:49 01/03/02 (1)
- More than I needed to know...and try the dictionary (nt) - CarlEber 19:36:00 01/03/02 (0)
- I think it's a... - Joe S 13:29:03 01/02/02 (1)
- Joe's got pigs on the brain - CarlEber 20:15:15 01/02/02 (0)
- Gosh! I'm impressed Carl. - Joe S 12:05:24 01/01/02 (3)
- Re: Gosh! I'm impressed Carl. - CarlEber 04:26:07 01/02/02 (2)
- Carl..... - Joe S 13:26:01 01/02/02 (1)
- Re: "S"..... - CarlEber 20:17:42 01/02/02 (0)
- Re: Hey! It's f#ckwit Carl! - Jim Willis 07:52:24 01/01/02 (1)
- Re: Hey! It's stinkpit Jimmy! - CarlEber 04:34:31 01/02/02 (0)
- Re: Uh huh... - Rich 06:59:41 12/27/01 (1)
- Re: Uh huh... - CarlEber 19:01:29 12/30/01 (0)