Home Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

RE: In this case, CR is absolutely right

>>>Yeah, either one will do just fine until you have lots of bonus features<<<
yea, where ARE all those interactive features of 1.1 and 2.0 BD promised? Oh that's right, they don't have any.

>>>So why would anyone purposefully choose the 30 gig format when you just acknowledged the 50 gig one will do just fine.<<<
Why are the majority of blu-ray movies on BD-25s? Are you going to throw away all the movies you have that are on BD-25s?

>>>Yet we can't even admit that it's a good idea to have higher capacity without attributing such claims to "fanboys".<<<
You have yet to prove it gives a better picture. You want us to accept it just because-that's the definition of a fanboy.

>>>Doesn't make sense. Capacity IS important.<<<
Again, PROVE IT GIVES A BETTER PICTURE. If you can't then it isn't important to EVERYONE.
BD may be better on paper, kind of like transistors are better than tubes on paper, and CDs are better than LPs on paper, but in practice, things are different. The theoretical advantages of BD really haven't panned out into practical advantages.

I believe is was Yogi Berra that said, "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they aren't"
Enjoy,
Jack




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Western Glow Tube Service  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.