Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Spoilers galore!

Posted by jamesgarvin on July 27, 2009 at 08:37:27:

"I never thought much was revealed about him so it just seemed a self-indulgent, drifting kid:"

Certainly not drifting. He was a product of a very solid upbringing. I thought his thoughts as revealed in his journals contained a very well thought out philosophy, however misguided, that society, jobs, and structure ruined mankind by making him feel safe and strong, when he was not really strong, only comfortable. He was not avoiding work, because he worked virtually everywhere he went, and worked for food.

"nothing exceptional about him except he died during one of his "stunts." Kind of a slow-motion "Jackass" stunt."

I am not sure I would classify his travels as a 'stunt.' The folks of Jacksass perform stunts for commerce, and as a competition against each other to determine who can abuse their bodies the most. McCandless, on the other hand, was competing against himself, following his belief that he could exist without other peoplem, and his philosophy that society killed in men the urge to be what they could really be. He burns his money, and turns his back on the priviledge that was his. Naive, perhaps. Reckelss, certainly. But certainly not a stunt.

One of the things I liked about Penn's story is that Penn places some hints about this kid in the film. His asking the ranch hand in Montana about how to dress killed game. His reliance on a book about edible plants. At the end of the day, McCandless had the knowledge, but not the experience.

"Sure, perhaps that's what the guy was like but this is not a documentary: it's got to have some drama. It didn't have enough, if any."

I think you have to factor in the family. At the end of the film, Penn thanks the family for their courage, and their willingness to essentially relive the events of their son's death. By all accounts, McCandless' family is still very distraught and grieving over his demise. I think adding false drama to make the film more entertaining insults their memories, and Penn seems sensitive to the family.

I think Hirsch chose to play McCandless as a starry eyed, ideological kid who is looking for adventure, and to make his view of the world work. I cannot criticize someone for making a legitimate choice, in light of his performance at the end of the story when death was near. His acting in that last act goes well beyond him looking like a skeleton.