Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: "is it really neccessary…?"

Posted by noobee on March 5, 2010 at 00:29:17:
thx for the reply. the slight differences in performance was what i was thinkin but a little unsure, so thanks for confirming my thoughts. i was told that the "better" cables ..... "offer a better, cleaner, and SAFER transfer of signal". the salesman was implying that the cheaper cables can and will harm ur TV. while the more expensive ones..(ie monstercable's Ultimate high speed HDMI)....offer a cleaner, more refined signal that is safer for the TV and will lengthen the lifespan. i wonder if this is true? anyway, im rambling now lol. thanks again for ur help/advice.