In Reply to: To much Computer Animation in Spiderman? posted by Bolt_Snypr on May 4, 2002 at 12:39:12:
Either way you can still focus on the optical aberrations in each process that make it look fake.*hint*......NONE of it is real.
Tom §.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Does it *really* matter if the special effects are photographic process or CG? - Tom §. 05:33:54 05/05/02 (9)
- Missed my point completely fellas. - Tom §. 06:52:12 05/06/02 (3)
- Re: Missed my point completely fellas. - Analog Scott 08:27:38 05/06/02 (2)
- Right - yata 17:41:41 05/06/02 (0)
- Couldn't have said it better.... - David S. 15:32:57 05/06/02 (0)
- Re: Does it *really* matter if the special effects are photographic process or CG? - Analog Scott 11:09:12 05/05/02 (0)
- Re: Does it *really* matter if the special effects are photographic process or CG? - mikenyc 05:51:57 05/05/02 (3)
- Special effects for idiots - Lasermeister 15:09:30 05/05/02 (2)
- That's a fact - Analog Scott 18:09:14 05/05/02 (1)
- Gawd, I remember those cheesy Hammer effects! ;^) - AuPh 09:13:24 05/06/02 (0)