In Reply to: Better? What's better? posted by Doug Schneider on May 18, 2002 at 12:04:11:
>>>>>I don't think we'll EVER see a better image than film. Why? Film is simply film,The quality of digital still images now has come close to that of film and has the potential to be much better. I don't see how its not going to be the same for motion pictures. What is true is that the digital convenience is somewhat a necessity, its allowed photographers to really enjoy their artistic freedom, which will increase manifold for motion pictures. But it will take time because the great artists have already been hardwired to the old technologies, so it won't be a while to see a great artist in the new mediums.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Better? What's better? - caa 12:47:07 05/18/02 (10)
- Re: Better? What's better? - Doug Schneider 13:15:34 05/18/02 (9)
- Agreed - Victor Khomenko 17:18:42 05/19/02 (1)
- I think.... - Doug Schneider 13:48:21 05/20/02 (0)
- Re: Better? What's better? - caa 18:29:46 05/18/02 (6)
- Re: Better? What's better? - Doug Schneider 20:37:05 05/18/02 (5)
- Re: Better? What's better? - caa 23:00:47 05/18/02 (4)
- Stop talking about things you don't understand! - alext 14:56:25 05/20/02 (0)
- Re: Better? What's better? - Doug Schneider 11:22:53 05/19/02 (0)
- Re: Better? What's better? - Analog Scott 10:27:41 05/19/02 (1)
- Re: Better? What's better? - Doug Schneider 11:23:54 05/19/02 (0)