In Reply to: Re: No. What? posted by reddmadder on August 5, 2002 at 11:46:00:
I think both of you are attributing a depth and thoughtfulness of content that this film simply lacks. It's one thing to plumb the depths. It's quite another to read meaning into something that simply isn't there.
Mel lost his faith and redisovered it courtesty of a few green aliens. And the director telegraphed the process with multiple "signs" scattered throughout the movie. Woopie! Deep.joe
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: No. What? - Joe S 08:59:49 08/06/02 (1)
- Re: No. What? - Analog Scott 09:16:30 08/06/02 (0)