In Reply to: that's what Tom Clancy is for IMHO _ <nt> posted by Mart on August 10, 2002 at 22:34:54:
Tom Clancy is for non-fiction junkies who want their fiction, "real".It's easy to see his crowd appeal in this post 9-11 world. But as far as having fun, he still doesn't know how to "Rock" yet. Strictly Old Old School.
Maybe he should take off those service caps he sports all the time, give his writing some air, and get jiggy with Rammstein, Queens of the Stone Age, and P.Diddy...and less Merle Haggard ?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Tom Clancy - mikenyc 23:45:55 08/10/02 (10)
- who? - Mart 00:07:51 08/11/02 (9)
- Re: who? - mikenyc 01:33:11 08/11/02 (8)
- most of them sound stale - Mart 04:19:58 08/11/02 (7)
- Re: most of them sound stale - mikenyc 09:18:35 08/11/02 (6)
- yes, they were just as stale as Slim Whitman _ <nt> - Mart 09:42:59 08/11/02 (5)
- Re: yes, they were just as stale as Slim Whitman _ <nt> - mikenyc 14:24:27 08/11/02 (4)
- no, they were just as stale as Slim Whitman _ <nt> - Mart 20:58:46 08/11/02 (3)
- Who's Staler .... Roger Whittaker, or Slim Whitman? :) <nt> - Radiola 14:54:56 08/12/02 (2)
- Re: Who's Staler .... Roger Whittaker, or Slim Whitman? :) ..You didn't include Boxcar Willie < - Pem 17:04:19 08/14/02 (0)
- don't know ... I avoid stale music - Mart 17:00:31 08/12/02 (0)