In Reply to: "Pearl Harbor" Reconsidered posted by mikenyc on August 11, 2002 at 11:45:24:
I agree with you that the cinematography (just) redeems "Pearl" to the extent where it is (just) watchable, but considering the budget thrown at this and what is obviously a very grandious attempt; I think it misses by miles.
That seems to be par for the course with Hollywood war film offerings; others even more appalling:
"U-571": just awful. Most 2 dimensional Harvey Keitel has ever been, must have taken some extra effort by the director to achieve that.
"Stalingrad" apalling unredeemable drivel.
Some that aren't bad:
1st 20 minutes of "Private Ryan", drivel for dialog thankfully drowned out by explosions;
Vietnam sequences in "Forrest Gump"
Edward Zwicks "Glory", and that only because of Denzel Washington (he won an Oscar), oh, and the exceptional musical score.
Eric
Tokyo*
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Pearl Harbor" Reconsidered - gware 22:21:23 08/11/02 (8)
- Re: "Pearl Harbor" Reconsidered - patrickU 00:44:35 08/12/02 (7)
- Re: "Pearl Harbor" Reconsidered - gware 21:18:00 08/12/02 (6)
- Today and Yesterday - mikenyc 05:16:47 08/13/02 (1)
- Re: Today and Yesterday - Auricle 13:18:39 08/13/02 (0)
- Re: "Pearl Harbor" Reconsidered - patrickU 23:53:04 08/12/02 (3)
- Pedro Almodovar and Mike Leigh... - gware 09:05:57 08/13/02 (2)
- Re: Agreed - David Mester 14:26:29 08/13/02 (0)
- Re: Pedro Almodovar and Mike Leigh... - patrickU 09:17:05 08/13/02 (0)