Or should it be, "Bored of the Rings"? I have to say that I read the book (or tried to) a long time ago, couldn't finish the book because it was just damn boring. The movie is equally as bad. I watched it for an hour and couldn't tell you what the hell was going on or what the plot might have been. Couldn't stand it any longer & went out into my workshop to clean up some tools, far more interesting than this wretched movie. Frodo Baggins my ass.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Lord of the Rings - FlameEye1 06:57:38 08/23/02 (13)
- I just finally watched it...you guys didn't tell me it was a kids movie. - cfraser 14:20:54 08/25/02 (7)
- It's very close to the original story (i.e., if in doubt, read the BOOK) - Audiophilander 20:53:59 08/25/02 (6)
- Re: It's very close to the original story (i.e., if in doubt, read the BOOK) - Larry S. 12:48:06 08/27/02 (3)
- Consider it an artistic decision on the Director's part. - Audiophilander 04:41:22 08/28/02 (2)
- Re: Consider it an artistic decision on the Director's part. - Larry S 17:10:19 08/28/02 (1)
- I beg to differ. - Audiophilander 19:58:03 08/28/02 (0)
- Re: It's very close to the original story (i.e., if in doubt, read the BOOK) - cfraser 11:25:19 08/26/02 (1)
- Yes, the version shown in theaters is the one Peter Jackson considers the "Director's cut." (nt) - Audiophilander 04:36:44 08/28/02 (0)
- Boored of the Rings by National Lampoon? - Larry S 12:56:19 08/23/02 (1)
- Re: Boored of the Rings by National Lampoon? - Radiex 20:39:18 08/23/02 (0)
- Re: Lord of the bored..... - patrickU 10:47:27 08/23/02 (0)
- Maybe next time they'll have Bruce Willis... - mvwine 08:09:16 08/23/02 (0)
- Appropriate moniker, dude. (nt) - Audiophilander 07:45:20 08/23/02 (0)