In Reply to: Re: Back to the future posted by gware on October 4, 2002 at 17:44:14:
I know...I know. What I just wanted to point out was the INSISTANCE of the camera...THAT is not usual !
As, at the time they were " ´high profile toys " ( The JVC and all ) The spectator was just overhelmed ..and did not see the grotesque of this publicity...now you can clearly..And that do NO good to this movie...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Back to the future - patrickU 00:09:19 10/05/02 (13)
- Guilty Pleasures...What Are Yours ????????? - mikenyc 01:14:48 10/05/02 (12)
- Re: Guilty Pleasures...What Are Yours ????????? - David Mester 06:49:53 10/05/02 (2)
- Re: Guilty Pleasures...What Are Yours ????????? - patrickU 13:53:59 10/06/02 (1)
- Re: Guilty Pleasures...What Are Yours ????????? - David Mester 10:38:35 10/07/02 (0)
- Woody Allen´s hobby.....But... - patrickU 02:41:53 10/05/02 (8)
- Re: Woody Allen´s hobby.....But... - mikenyc 05:51:58 10/05/02 (7)
- Baby... - patrickU 06:36:24 10/05/02 (6)
- It's OK Patrick... Guilty Pleasures... - gware 08:50:37 10/05/02 (5)
- I don't see - tinear 10:34:48 10/05/02 (1)
- Breaker Morant - gware 17:09:14 10/05/02 (0)
- Re: It's OK Patrick... Guilty Pleasures... - patrickU 09:06:54 10/05/02 (2)
- The Limey... - gware 09:43:58 10/05/02 (1)
- Re: The Limey... - patrickU 10:04:25 10/05/02 (0)