In Reply to: Interesting! posted by Victor Khomenko on November 22, 2002 at 08:07:22:
Each of his films was special, an attempt at something different and largely succesful.Disagree about Mozart. Mozart compared to Shostakovich or Mahler-- no way. Not even apples and oranges. French to Chinese food or something on that order.
Woody is much more a lightweight than Mozart IMO. Woody's self absorption is noticeably more obvious in his work than is Mozart's for one main difference.
Like you, I don't have a great affinity for Hitchcock. I've seen most of his stuff, wouldn't care to see it again.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Agree about Kubrick - edta 11:25:43 11/22/02 (4)
- Re: Agree about Kubrick - Victor Khomenko 11:38:37 11/22/02 (3)
- Dangerous Analogies - Harmonia 13:19:08 11/22/02 (2)
- Stop beating me on that Mozard thingy, you guys! - Victor Khomenko 13:50:59 11/22/02 (1)
- ROFL! Bury yourself Victor! - Harmonia 20:06:15 11/25/02 (0)