In Reply to: Re: senselessness as a vehicle to tax the emotions posted by Doug Schneider on December 27, 2002 at 15:04:48:
that is funny. i guess i saw it through the husband's eyes. the lover did not appeal to me. i didn't see any value in him or in the affair.he was a bit phony to me, and obviously she didn't want to see it. i found no poignancy in him. that braille junk wouldn't have sold me if i was a woman. that hard banging, whoopie doo. it was very obvious that he had one intention. maybe he is a woman's type. maybe women are gullible too. :)
maybe that was part of the intention. someone sort of appealing, but really not, made it seem all the more senseless.
are women and men really that vulnerable to someone with 'looks'?
the husband was the more substantive of the two men. but he wasn't perfect either. seems to blank out a bit, but recover with some sensibilities. he was a little tiring, but not enough to be stupid over someone else.
the woman had her little journey, her intoxication. but it was no small journey. it went beyond, and then the whole thing went beyond.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- :) :) - njjohn 20:16:41 12/27/02 (0)