In Reply to: Re: Never met that one posted by patrickU on June 21, 2003 at 08:58:09:
I will drag me feet on this one. Films by women about women are usually quite weak. I hear you love it, and I will consider it, but all those "sex revolutionaries" and just simple sex addicts don't excite me - I mean it is OK to do, but the expectation that that side of their lives is somehow going to be of interest to others is stupid.What did Anais bring that has not been studies, described and lived thousands of times before?
There is absolutely nothing unique about being promiscuous, sleeping with men, women, dogs, etc, yet every now and then a movie maker will come along who feels that that alone makes for a "shocking" new film.
It ends up being exceedingly boring, like Henry and June was.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Smell of another Anais? - Victor Khomenko 09:17:34 06/21/03 (10)
- Henry and June... - patrickU 09:41:52 06/21/03 (9)
- Should I see it before Le Cercle Rouge? - Victor Khomenko 09:54:15 06/21/03 (8)
- Melville ? - patrickU 15:30:50 06/21/03 (7)
- Le Samurai I thought was just so-so (nt) - Victor Khomenko 17:24:41 06/21/03 (2)
- Re: Le Samurai I thought was just so-so (nt) - patrickU 01:04:57 06/22/03 (1)
- Yep... give me Touchez pas au grisbi over that cold fish any day! (nt) - Victor Khomenko 12:05:34 06/23/03 (0)
- Re: Melville ? - Victor Khomenko 15:55:25 06/21/03 (3)
- Re: Melville ? - patrickU 01:17:52 06/22/03 (2)
- Re: Melville ? - Victor Khomenko 08:32:22 06/23/03 (1)
- Re: Melville ? - patrickU 09:20:27 06/23/03 (0)