In Reply to: The worse ever put ( luckily on digital ) on film. nt posted by patrickU on July 9, 2003 at 05:53:58:
I feel like we are piling up on a poor guy, but I recall the early screening of the last (I hope!) ditigal version, don't recall the title of it, just that Natalie was there... I had to go see it because it was during the High-End show days and it was group event... clark was also rounded and sat in the same row, I believe, also moving his legs restlessly, or just pretending, I don't know... anyway, boring would not describe that waste of time, but I had to wait for my "group" to be done, as we traveled in pack for courtesy sake, amazinly after the "film" was over I heard everyone talk about image quality - that was the BIG first digital, as I said, and I don't recall anyone making any comments on the film content, acting, directing, whatever we tend to associate with movie making.Was it the worst ever put on film? I doubt it, there are some VERY strong contenders for that title!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: The worse ever put ( luckily on digital ) on film. nt - Victor Khomenko 07:08:32 07/09/03 (2)
- The last Star Wars - vverrryyy tiresome - Politics Fan 15:46:43 08/01/03 (0)
- Re: The worse ever put ( luckily on digital ) on film. nt - patrickU 07:31:04 07/09/03 (0)