In Reply to: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! posted by gware on October 1, 2003 at 21:05:02:
The name of the Rose..a good film ? One of the worst ever...You must have been:1) Madly in love with a beautifule japanese creature..
2) Totally drunk
3) bothSir Sean has chic to choose only very bad films to play in it. Presence is good when you are 25, and with over 60 he still has ...but he is laking of good judgement...and the good directors are not a plenty..what is left are terribly boring films...
This man is just good enough to play " decoration ".
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - patrickU 03:38:14 10/02/03 (12)
- Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - Dmitry 11:26:07 10/02/03 (11)
- Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - patrickU 13:54:05 10/02/03 (10)
- Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - Dmitry 14:36:09 10/02/03 (9)
- Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - patrickU 00:45:32 10/03/03 (8)
- Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - orejones 01:34:50 10/04/03 (7)
- Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - patrickU 05:45:23 10/04/03 (6)
- Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - Dmitry 06:05:30 10/04/03 (5)
- Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - patrickU 06:10:31 10/04/03 (4)
- Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - Dmitry 07:37:41 10/04/03 (3)
- Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - patrickU 08:24:13 10/04/03 (2)
- Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - Dmitry 13:50:52 10/04/03 (1)
- Esperanto, maybe? (nt) - orejones 02:26:54 10/07/03 (0)