In Reply to: Re: Movies: why call it 'film' and glamorize/glorify it? posted by rico on November 13, 2003 at 11:19:34:
found several articles from the old days which state, ambiguously, that the film was censored. Omitted was the fact that it was self-omitted by its creator.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hey Rico: it seems you were correct about Kubrick and CO. But, in my defense, I have - tinear 17:03:34 11/13/03 (2)
- Re: You are a gentleman, sir. - rico 09:00:39 11/14/03 (1)
- Re: Did you expect something else? nt - patrickU 11:28:41 11/14/03 (0)