In Reply to: That's sad... posted by Harmonia on December 21, 2003 at 19:40:22:
Having witnessed the parts of the first two films left me completely unwanting of getting any more of it.So unless you are implying the third one is done in a completely different style I see no reason to waste my time on it.
The first two I found incredibly boring... so sue me for not wanting to see the third one. But I truly believe that I can find better use for my time and money.
Somehow I find the notion that one must see every film just to know it is bad indefensible.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hardly - Victor Khomenko 20:01:31 12/21/03 (7)
- Absolutely no problem with your decision not to see the film - Yo Mama 09:10:49 12/22/03 (1)
- Argue though you may... - Audiophilander 11:15:23 12/22/03 (0)
- "Somehow I find the notion that one must see every film just to know it is bad indefensible." Baloney! - Audiophilander 07:24:02 12/22/03 (4)
- First you lied about clark, now you are lying about me... can't you stay with facts? Apparenlty not. - Victor Khomenko 08:06:06 12/22/03 (3)
- LOL! ...Wow! You accuse me of lying when I place YOUR OWN QUOTED REMARK smack-dab in front of you! - Audiophilander 08:37:13 12/22/03 (2)
- Sic 'em boy, sic 'em! n/t - Troy 08:52:25 12/22/03 (1)
- Like a junkyard dog! (nt) - Audiophilander 11:17:37 12/22/03 (0)