In Reply to: RE: Where will Baldwin's blank take us? posted by Ozzie on November 8, 2021 at 11:39:28:
Your analogy doesn't work nor does it reflect the law. If you are at a cross walk do you look both ways? Yes.But if you don't and someone comes around the corner at 90 mph and hits you are you legally at fault? No.
Should Baldwin have insisted on inspecting the gun? Obviously in retrospect yes. Was he legally obligated to inspect a gun that was declared cold by the 1st AD? No. It's his option not his legal responsibility. The armorer and the 1st AD should do time. They were the ones who completely ignored and broke protocols.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Where will Baldwin's blank take us? - Analog Scott 07:49:18 11/09/21 (5)
- You're making crap up - Ozzie 08:39:15 11/09/21 (4)
- Dude take a good ahrd look in the mirror - Analog Scott 12:11:59 11/09/21 (3)
- Sorry pal... - Ozzie 12:39:10 11/09/21 (2)
- RE: Sorry pal... - Analog Scott 12:47:14 11/09/21 (1)
- RE: Sorry pal... - Ozzie 13:29:28 11/09/21 (0)