In Reply to: Roger Ebert is wrong! posted by TAFKA Steve on July 14, 2001 at 11:04:30:
I think you'd make a better case by including Tom Green with Seagal and Bergen. Their inevitable existence allows a claim such as this, in the same way some say "This preamp betters than those 15 times its price".Chess is an easy game in the sense that whoever has more mental storage wins the game. Go would be more challenging for computers to beat. Acting involves creativities which I think we don't yet understand enough to make computers do it for themselves. The best we can do is to let computers imitate what's already out there; and we'd see lots of Deniro, Pacino,...animations, and that's all. Not exactly an art or too much fun. However, this is all very interesting because the director will have much more control and freedom. Its also a great thing for home movies, where we can devote more to the stories than having to worry about the actors.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Roger Ebert is wrong! - caa 15:37:45 07/14/01 (2)
- hey, i used to play Go all the time - late 21:18:39 07/14/01 (1)
- Re: hey, i used to play Go all the time - caa 21:48:18 07/15/01 (0)