In Reply to: pretentious snobs posted by Prokofief on January 2, 2004 at 19:16:53:
I read the book and yes, it WAS better than the movie. It was an interesting historical non-fiction book about an interesting time and place. "Doesn't meet my intellectual sesitivities"? The movie's packed with rah-rah jingoistic grandstanding. It's feel good claptrap for a society looking desperately for escapism and feeling good about itself for something, ANYthing.No intellectual movies in years? I kinda doubt that. But even so, I don't think it's a question of intelectualism, it's a question of quality. Seabiscuit was tedious and obvious, taking no intelectual or artistic chances. It was a gritty and difficult time for America and hores racing back then was a violent and gritty world, but this film depicted it far too rosy and Disni-fied.
Who wants to see a movie designed simply for "the common folk"? How dull.
Most movies ARE designed for the common folk. Most movies suck. Most movies are forgotten 5 years after their release.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yer full of it. - Troy 23:17:48 01/02/04 (4)
- Proko, you sound like an unimaginative polly-anna n/t - Troy 18:08:50 01/04/04 (2)
- I rest my case, nt. - Prokofief 10:14:56 01/06/04 (1)
- Me too, n/t - Troy 23:07:16 01/06/04 (0)
- Troy,You sound like a bitter unhappy person, nt - Prokofief 05:30:06 01/03/04 (0)