In Reply to: AuPh=Pasolini? posted by Victor Khomenko on January 31, 2004 at 08:23:30:
NO, for heaven´s sake...
It was meant that Pao was..Homosexual and so far there was no danger that he will get the dirls on the set!
That was it....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: AuPh=Pasolini? - patrickU 09:41:25 01/31/04 (0)