In Reply to: But of course you ain't posted by Victor Khomenko on February 11, 2004 at 09:24:30:
I don't recognize one name on that list, so I don't know if you're being facetious or whether or not you're trying to pass yrself off as an intellectual. Regardless, outside of the fact that I didn't ask you what you DID read, whatever it was you were reading clearly didn't enable you to understand satire when you see it; nor did it equip you with the ability to blame the correct party in a situation such as this where you find fault with a movie actor & blame him for 'creating' that which was actually created by others. Not sure how Troy's comment has anything do with this; seems to me it's more a case of you not having yr facts straight.Belushi was no saint & deserves criticism for his poor handling of his drug problem as well as his lack of professionalism on television programs & movie sets--but not only is he not guilty of the sins you are taking him to task for, you make yrself look idiotic by allowing yr dislike for him to project onto yr unjustly blaming him for as much as you do.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'm not impressed - J 10:31:33 02/11/04 (4)
- Re: It's clear... - rico 11:20:13 02/11/04 (3)
- Re: It's clear... - J 11:27:39 02/11/04 (2)
- Don't worry about the Ivy League - Victor Khomenko 12:00:51 02/11/04 (1)
- Re: Don't worry about the Ivy League - orejones 12:35:33 02/11/04 (0)