In Reply to: Re: Guilty Pleasure? posted by Ears on February 17, 2004 at 22:54:48:
I don´t think so, stylish they are, but I never REALLY enjoy them, I never had the wish to view them twice, I remember " The man who was not there " I had admiration, but no love for it. I miss something.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Guilty Pleasure? - patrickU 03:54:08 02/18/04 (17)
- The Man Who Wasn't There - Troy 07:25:31 02/18/04 (16)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - Dmitry 08:17:38 02/18/04 (0)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - patrickU 07:47:32 02/18/04 (0)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - rico 07:45:07 02/18/04 (13)
- Not in "Miller´s Crossing" - orejones 08:35:43 02/18/04 (2)
- Re: Not in "Miller´s Crossing" - rico 08:48:28 02/18/04 (1)
- Re: Not in "Miller´s Crossing" - Dmitry 08:57:29 02/18/04 (0)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - patrickU 07:52:57 02/18/04 (9)
- No,.. - Hepcat 15:59:08 02/19/04 (0)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - Dmitry 08:20:59 02/18/04 (7)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - patrickU 08:41:09 02/18/04 (6)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - Dmitry 08:53:22 02/18/04 (3)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - patrickU 09:00:41 02/18/04 (2)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - Dmitry 09:07:34 02/18/04 (1)
- Re: The Man Who Wasn't There - patrickU 09:32:24 02/18/04 (0)
- Re: The Hudsucker Proxy - rico 08:46:27 02/18/04 (1)
- Re: The Hudsucker Proxy - patrickU 08:56:18 02/18/04 (0)