What is this film about? The male form? Latent tendencies? Why was there a conflict between seemingly detached characters? I dunno.What I can say is that it was shot in the most unique point of view I can recall. The cinematography, both beautiful and dramatic, was the film itself. The color, the closeness, the study of the characters were all brought together by the lens and Denis' attention to detail. Certainly style of substance but worth seeing for that very reason.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Beau Travail: Whaaaaaaat?? - albee33 07:00:56 03/11/04 (10)
- Re: Beau Travail: Whaaaaaaat?? - patrickU 04:17:34 03/12/04 (9)
- Agree. I saw it twice -- in the theatre! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:26 03/12/04 (0)
- I failed to mention that it was definitely . . . - albee33 08:27:37 03/12/04 (7)
- Woman... shmoman... - Victor Khomenko 16:22:54 03/12/04 (5)
- You lusty fellow. -n - albee33 20:31:38 03/12/04 (4)
- You should try Patrick - Victor Khomenko 05:11:05 03/13/04 (3)
- Re: Is Albee a " she "? - patrickU 07:36:24 03/13/04 (2)
- You libertine . . . in your dreams! -n - albee33 09:31:09 03/13/04 (1)
- Re: If you mean that " libertine " comes from " Liberté " then " guilty " nt - patrickU 10:17:43 03/13/04 (0)
- Re: That is what I did... - patrickU 08:46:08 03/12/04 (0)