In Reply to: Re: Addendum on when the Academy Awards started to sink posted by RGA on March 17, 2004 at 13:43:34:
***The notion of a classic or a masterpiece can fit few other films than Jaws or E.T. Movies that some dim witted individuals passed of as nothing more than thriller or special effects movies continue to be popular well after the special effects. Jaws and E.T. don't hold up any longer(even with the few touch ups). Films that are nearly 25 and 30 years old still managing to impact "MOST" movie goers is impressive no matter how a few in the minority whine.That is a weak argument. The fact Jaws still "impacts" has to do a lot with the shock element.
The shock can be done in a subtle way (the creeping horror of the Repulsion) or in a direct, primitive , hammer-to-the-head one, as in Jaws.
Either one will continue shocking the public, but really, only one should be considered as a "classic", as the effect of the hammer is way to predictable to imply any creativity on part of the maker.
Simply showing open guts will get it every time. 25 years, or 50 years, or 300 years later. But that is NOT art.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Addendum on when the Academy Awards started to sink - Victor Khomenko 14:53:25 03/17/04 (4)
- Re: Addendum on when the Academy Awards started to sink - RGA 20:53:18 03/17/04 (3)
- Re: Addendum on when the Academy Awards started to sink - Victor Khomenko 04:12:41 03/18/04 (2)
- Gladiator was a POS - RGA 21:56:18 03/18/04 (1)
- BTW - RGA 22:11:34 03/18/04 (0)