In Reply to: There are two "R's" in aberrations, but I wouldn't nail you on a grammatical error. posted by Audiophilander on March 17, 2004 at 12:06:44:
The lack of two "r's" is more specifically a spelling error.And the term "optomologist" doesn't exist--truly an abeRRation!
How about ophthamologist--it helps to know the first part derives from the Greek ophthalmos "eye."
regards, townsend
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: There are two "R's" in aberrations, but I wouldn't nail you on a grammatical error. - townsend 18:19:12 03/17/04 (3)
- Actually, the term Optomologist does exist or I wouldn't have used it. - Audiophilander 19:03:28 03/17/04 (2)
- Re: Actually, the term Optomologist does exist or I wouldn't have used it. - townsend 06:14:29 03/18/04 (1)
- Sorry, with all the heated rhetoric of late I missed your jest; BTW, I do occasionally post on Hi-Rez Highway & Outside. - Audiophilander 08:51:04 03/18/04 (0)