In Reply to: Peter Greenaway posted by djprobed on March 19, 2004 at 07:58:29:
I like him for his thick image mastery, but generally consider him a poor artist overall.The reason is he tends to go for simple effects in order to impress and sometimes shock. So in the Cook the beautiful voice is contrasted against the horrible backdrop of rotting flesh, and on, and on... and that is his trademark. Too primitive to be worthy of a top class master.
But as an image creator he is exceptional. Except there he also knows not where to stop, so his Prospero's Book is just way too thick for its own good - the beautiful images have to be cut with the chain saw, and one can hardly make it through this visual feast - I felt like walking through a molasses-filled tunnel.
Not exactly my idea of fine art.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Peter Greenaway - Victor Khomenko 08:28:07 03/19/04 (6)
- Re: Peter Greenaway - patrickU 08:48:10 03/19/04 (5)
- Re: Peter Greenaway - djprobed 09:48:42 03/19/04 (4)
- Re: Peter Greenaway - patrickU 03:18:54 03/20/04 (1)
- Thanks-- my pleasure <nt> - djprobed 07:06:10 03/22/04 (0)
- Drowning by Numbers was good fun . . . - albee33 12:48:18 03/19/04 (1)
- It was entertaining, yes - Victor Khomenko 17:24:06 03/19/04 (0)