In Reply to: Don't bore us with your lame derivative humor posted by Victor Khomenko on March 20, 2004 at 05:10:58:
BTW, as I've clearly stated numerous times before, ad nauseum, I tend to be a counter-puncher when verbally attacked; I respond IN-KIND, with measured responses to ripostes. You sort of allude to that yourself by calling my responses "lame" AND "derivitive" suggesting, albeit unintentionally, that the original source (i.e., your remarks) is equally lame!BTW, speaking of derivative, here's a little more borrowed from RGA. I'll follow suit and ask if you've seen any good American movies recently? Let's see your list of Academy Award winners.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "lame derivative humor" would that be under V or K in the dictionary? - Audiophilander 10:28:32 03/20/04 (2)
- Lame retort - Victor Khomenko 10:59:21 03/20/04 (1)
- Sorry, but I'm not interested in your "bloomers" or your "blushing"; that's Patrick's department. - Audiophilander 23:23:58 03/20/04 (0)