In Reply to: Re: Signs was one of the worst film I ever saw.nt posted by Rob Doorack on May 5, 2004 at 11:24:49:
The difference would be that by Ed Wood it would have turn cult some thirty years later, here we have no chance to see the same pheneomena. The first part was just playing with the spectator which of course is legitim as long you don´t see the ropes.
Helas, they are very gross. But for the first fifteen minutes I was intrigue too,then...
The rest is as you said.
Plainly stupid and empty.
Made for debile. ( sound arrogant? good...)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Signs was one of the worst film I ever saw.nt - patrickU 11:33:39 05/05/04 (4)
- Ed Wood vs. M. Night Shyamalan - Rob Doorack 11:51:23 05/07/04 (1)
- Re: Ed Wood vs. M. Night Shyamalan - patrickU 12:03:47 05/07/04 (0)
- Re :PS: - patrickU 11:46:15 05/05/04 (1)
- O.K. .... financial disclosure laws require me to reveal - Elmo 11:55:04 05/05/04 (0)