In Reply to: "...by using better film stock." It was digital -- like everything all too soon will be. nt posted by clarkjohnsen on June 7, 2004 at 14:51:21:
Ark is actually perhaps his most watchable movie - try some earlier ones, from the time when he developed his ugly touch.I presume he knew that the Ark's target audience (foreigners, for sure... we've been through this one!) would not tolerate the images of the Molokh, so he had to tone his "artistism" down great deal.
I believe his "touch" indeed originated from bad film stock, but as I have not been exacty the student of his art, I will not swear to that at this moment. I will find out for sure - one friend is his fan and has all his films.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Clark... clark... I wasn't talking about the Ark as much - Victor Khomenko 15:35:45 06/07/04 (2)
- Let me know... nt - clarkjohnsen 15:39:02 06/07/04 (1)
- Spoke to him last night... - Victor Khomenko 06:15:49 06/08/04 (0)