In Reply to: Thanks... posted by scott wurcer on August 24, 2004 at 04:57:29:
The film, I think, is weak and gratuitous in the extreme... therefore I think it wouldn't be a mistake to call it pornographic.301/302... that one is not a strong film by any stretch. It had some intriguing moments, but overall not much to remember.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I am not sure I agree - Victor Khomenko 06:33:26 08/24/04 (0)