In Reply to: nope posted by late on April 24, 2000 at 13:56:17:
***Lastly, give me an alternative. Pretend you're Reno,Brrrrrr... Can I have a different one? Be kind to me.
***now deal with it. You have a duty to fulfill, to uphold the rule of law. In this case, several laws, and a treaty.
Actually, this is far easier than it might sound (guess who made it sound worth than it is?). The negotiation was moving fast towards setting up a safehouse in Florida, where the boy would be living with his father awaiting the court decision - all this in 100% compliance with *US* law. The layers from BOTH sides would be allowed to visit them and get ready for court trial. Again, the boy and his father...
However, the worst remaining mother...er on Earth, the decaying stinky relic, that Castro piece of ... would not allow this to happen. So their side simply vetoed the deal right before storming in took place. Now there is no way the court can make an unbiased decision.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: nope - Victor Khomenko 15:00:58 04/24/00 (19)
- nope, Part 2 - late 17:22:34 04/24/00 (18)
- the real question is custody - Mart 19:37:24 04/24/00 (0)
- Re: nope, Part 2 - Victor Khomenko 19:12:17 04/24/00 (15)
- rule of law - late 06:43:43 04/25/00 (14)
- Re: rule of law - Victor Khomenko 07:07:57 04/25/00 (13)
- Re: rule of law - dave 12:50:33 04/25/00 (9)
- Re: rule of law - Victor Khomenko 13:06:59 04/25/00 (8)
- jurisdiction, lack thereof - late 14:10:04 04/25/00 (7)
- Re: jurisdiction, lack thereof - Mart 19:14:56 04/25/00 (1)
- INS is just a puppet - Victor Khomenko 19:38:57 04/25/00 (0)
- As far as I know,.. Legal system still trying to work - Victor Khomenko 14:23:27 04/25/00 (4)
- and very well, much to the dismay of the ignorant (nt) - petew 19:22:25 04/25/00 (3)
- Re: nt.ne.more - MiKe- 03:57:46 04/27/00 (1)
- Re: nt.ne.more - Mart 05:19:04 04/27/00 (0)
- actually... - late 07:41:19 04/25/00 (2)
- Re: actually... - Victor Khomenko 08:28:08 04/25/00 (1)
- not instead but "countermanning" <nt> - Mart 09:55:35 04/25/00 (0)
- arrgghh! it should read 'amicable settlement' --nt-- - late 17:24:25 04/24/00 (0)