In Reply to: The Virgin tin posted by Victor Khomenko on February 13, 2005 at 07:05:24:
I haven't seen it for awhile but it was quite explicit that they had a carnal relationship. It had fatherly overtones, sure, which was the sick part....you may have seen a bowdlerized version.
I agree her performance was excellent, as was Jean's. It was a pretty decent movie except for the moral lapse which is not insignificant.
BTW, you are going to be disappointed in Natalie's performance in Closer: she shows her butt but not her top. One reviewer (TNY) takes her to task for it, arguing that the role demanded that honesty.
Frankly, I don't think she HAS breasts worth revealing. Now, Heather's, Winona's, or Scarlett's....I think we'd need widescreen.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The naif Vic. - tinear 07:32:59 02/13/05 (4)
- Not all that impressive, tin.... - dennzio 07:50:45 02/13/05 (3)
- Seriously, who is this? Doesn't look like Winona, - tinear 11:02:50 02/13/05 (2)
- Isn't that old Whosit from Whatsit- "16 Candles"? ( nt? or-) - Bambi B 21:10:40 02/13/05 (1)
- That was my guess but I didn't see DZs point, then? nt - tinear 05:20:51 02/14/05 (0)