"What the @*&# do we know"?

Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

4.254.139.50

A brilliant film...for the first 30 minutes where it begins to go a bit sideways with an MTV-ish break that goes on entirely too long and it also re-cycles its earlier ideas repeatedly. For those who don't know much about quantum physics, it may be a bit upsetting to realize "before" and "after" have little meaning, really. Or that objects can be in two (or many more) places simultaneously---and then, for all practical purposes, disappear. Or that (moving away a bit from quantum physics, for a moment) strong, repetitive emotions can act exactly like heroin upon our axons and dendrites.
Still, a shockingly good performance from Marlee Matlin: the best single female performance I've seen this year.
And, what's more, she does something equally important: she re-invents what beautiful means. In today's world of non-sexuality of women (perhaps due to industry fears of being called, horrors, "sexist!") in mainstream and indies films, Matlin exudes fire and passion---and sensuality.
Physically, she lets us see her imperfections: a few too many pounds, here and there, a bit too much nose.
But, overall, in a word, she looks...fabulous. A REAL woman and not some emaciated, girlish (or boyish, for that matter), cartoon-perfect waif.
Bravo to Marlee.
Go see this film!
(I almost flipped at one point: when I was a film student in Portland, I lived in a loft seemingly in the same building above that very basketball court and my student film used that exact location!)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

Topic - "What the @*&# do we know"? - tinear 08:40:53 02/19/05 (8)

It was a moderately well performed poor/trite ABC After School Special of a movie - sjb 16:04:56 02/20/05 (0)

I'd call it interesting... - mkuller 12:09:26 02/20/05 (0)

Re: "What the @*&# do we know"? - Analog Scott 07:57:01 02/20/05 (0)

Re: "What the @*&# do we know"? - patrickU 10:04:02 02/19/05 (4)

Huh? nt - tinear 11:30:53 02/19/05 (3)

Re: Huh? nt - patrickU 01:02:20 02/20/05 (2)

Explain "beaming." I hope you're not referring to Star Trek? nt - tinear 12:03:44 02/20/05 (1)

Re: Explain "beaming." I hope you're not referring to Star Trek? nt - patrickU 12:15:03 02/20/05 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.