In Reply to: Oh, so a post about race necessarily posted by tinear on March 20, 2005 at 04:15:46:
"You and Scott fail to acknowledge the ridiculous amount of Holocaust related films that are released every year."Are you now claiming that Chariots of Fire is a holocaust related movie? I guess history isn't one of your favorite subjects. Chariots of Fire predates the holocaust. Duh. Now to the subject you have chosen to arbitrarily raise since it has NOTHING to do with Chariots of Fire, the movie you attacked because it depicted the real life struggle of one Jew. Unlike you, I feel film makers are free to choose their subject matter and if a number of film makers choose to make films about the holocaust that is thier right as artists and not a problem. There are no quotas on such things as subjects for films and obviously there shouldn't be. Sorry dude but your posts become more and more idiotic and facist each time around. You attacked an excellent film because it included the real life struggle of one Jew. That's pretty damned anti-semitic in my book.
"Next up, Patrick and Scott savage a food critic for suggesting traditional Jewish food is inedible and that Maneschevitz is truly terrible wine..."
Dude, seriously, get a clue. If the movie were bad for artistic reasons that would be one thing. You attacked *because* it depicted the struggle of one Jew. If a food critic attacks anything *because* it is Jewish and not because it tastes bad he or she would be every bit the anti-semite you seem to be.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Oh, so a post about race necessarily - Analog Scott 09:30:24 03/20/05 (2)
- Uh, Scott, guess reason is - tinear 14:02:55 03/20/05 (1)
- Re: Uh, Scott, guess reason is - Analog Scott 15:08:01 03/20/05 (0)