In Reply to: Re: Another pointless movie about a serial killer with posted by jamesgarvin on March 20, 2005 at 16:08:27:
formulas exist: since you cannot sit for a 72-hour spectacle, the director is forced to present a "finished" product in the space of a few hours.
Anyhow, you felt the character was worth knowing about, I didn't. He destroyed a relationship and his life for what? Penn is saying that it was for NOTHING. In other words, Nicholson's entire effort was absurd, pointless. He failed. The murderer "won."
Sorry, but that happens in "real life" enough. We want to see a guy triumph over adversity. You know, the old Oscar Wilde saying, "We're all lying in the gutter but some of us are looking at the stars."
Penn is looking at the shit. Just cause it's depressing, nihilistic, and negative doesn't make it "art," avant-garde, or worthwhile.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ok, an honest disagreement. There is a reason - tinear 16:18:51 03/20/05 (3)
- Re: "...the murderer 'won' " - rico 05:48:23 03/21/05 (2)
- He won as far as he avoided punishment for his - tinear 07:04:15 03/21/05 (1)
- Re: He won as far as he avoided punishment for his - rico 09:18:30 03/21/05 (0)