In Reply to: Have to disagree here posted by Jack G on April 8, 2005 at 11:27:33:
> Good FX are not a substitute for a good story-The Day after Tommorrow is a perfect example of FX in desperate need of a story-another waste of FX.Eyecandy movies have their place, I find they are actually better with little to no plot instead of a bad plot. Sky Captain, to paraphrase the great Joe Bob Brigs, had "... no plot to get in the way of the story."
If I feel like watching a mindless movie, I'd rather there be lots of really nice scenery with minimal talking/plot mucking up the pretty pictures. Star Wars Episode I is an excellent example of a crappy plot and bad acting getting in the way of amazingly good visuals.2001 is the ultimate example of the semi-plotless movie. It looks amazing, but doesn't have a plot in the conventional sense of the word. I've heard theories that the plot is actually based on music, with a first, second and third "movement" pretty well delineated (Dawn of man / 2001 / Beyond the infinite) The music in the movie progresses in the same fashion (no music/noise -> classical -> avantgarde, Philip Glass-esque opera)
/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Eye candy movies - jbmcb 12:37:33 04/08/05 (3)
- Jesus, you're bringing 2001 into a discussion of Captain? - tinear 14:47:43 04/08/05 (1)
- Connections & Circles - jbmcb 21:14:03 04/08/05 (0)
- You have a point - Jack G 14:17:22 04/08/05 (0)