I have the restored two disc DVD version and last night I watched it with Roger Ebert's commentary. He is so much better than Peter Bogdanovitch, who also comments on a separate track. This is also true of their commentaries on "Citizen Kane", where that also both appear. For "Casablanca", Ebert points out the many phony effects shots and the big goof no one seems to mention: whay would letters of transit in and out of Vichy France be signed by the free French's de Gaul?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - "Casablanca" - rico 07:01:55 04/23/05 (3)
- Why spoil this film? - BJordan 19:05:52 04/24/05 (2)
- Re: Why spoil this film? - rico 07:28:15 04/25/05 (0)
- I agree (nt) - Victor Khomenko 19:52:58 04/24/05 (0)