The Interpreter really was

Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

4.254.156.245

Lost in Translation. The "translation" being the idea to the film.
Two hours of a romantic thriller w/out either.
Penn and Kidman, two of the finest actors today, had waaaay too many closeups and "speeches" which they delivered as...well, speeches. Zero chemistry between them. And, after building to a climax for two hours...the "conflict" is "resolved" with the silliest ending I can remember. This will become a classic of ridiculous, shaggy-dog story-telling.
The warning sign was there for all to see right in the opening credits: three writers. Try eating a dish three chefs have prepared. It'll leave a taste as bad as this fallen soufflÃ© did.
(And, it is inexusable to not even get basic occupational facts correct in such a big budget film: translators do not translate from English into another language and from another back into English: each is a specialty. Further, Kidman does double-duty with French! Ridiculous.).

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

The Cable Cooker

Topic - The Interpreter really was - tinear 17:32:23 05/09/05 (2)

Re: The Interpreter really was - rico 06:42:20 05/10/05 (1)

What a mess! Maybe some had split personalities, as well? nt - tinear 15:14:05 05/10/05 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.