In Reply to: "Glorify means putting the violence is a positive light." posted by Donald on May 23, 2005 at 09:53:55:
I am not sure we saw the same picture. I have seen many westerns. In my youth, and in my weaker moments as an adult, I have wanted to be Clint Eastwood. Free. No responsibility. And of course, being the fast draw and accurate shot. Killing the other guy before he kills you. And there is never a body to clean up. There is never any grieving mother, wives, or children. There is never any blood. Kill em' and move on.Can't say I wanted to be any of the characters in City of God. Can't say that I would have enjoyed growing up in a place like that. The former is a clear glorification of violence because there are no consequences, but because it happens in another time and place, we give it a pass.
What positive spin does City of God make on violence? What benefit does the film tell us that violence accomplishes? Who are the bad guys that are portrayed as good guys? I see City of God, and I see despair, and violent people getting their just rewards, and getting it rather unpleasantly, not merely a quick shot, then keel over. Hardly a sales pitch to join that fraternity.
Surely, you feel that it glorifies violence, you must have some scenes in mind, or what or how, specifically, it glorifies violence.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Glorify means putting the violence is a positive light." - jamesgarvin 10:05:23 05/23/05 (2)
- It's the way it's filmed. - Donald 10:48:00 05/23/05 (1)
- Re: It's the way it's filmed. - jamesgarvin 11:04:22 05/23/05 (0)