In Reply to: Re: War of the Worlds------After thoughts. posted by RGA on July 8, 2005 at 20:54:07:
x
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Those airborne toxins came straight from H.G. Wells. Be fair. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:54:20 07/09/05 (12)
- That may be - RGA 17:58:58 07/10/05 (11)
- You may be right -- I rarely go to such type movies... nt - clarkjohnsen 10:45:07 07/11/05 (7)
- Typical, ... - Audiophilander 10:57:12 07/11/05 (6)
- I was being conciliatory. You OTOH are your usual stodgy self. Desist. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:11:15 07/11/05 (5)
- I believe that, in your case, "being conciliatory" is a euphemism for flip-flopping. - Audiophilander 23:04:11 07/11/05 (4)
- Well at least you're not calling me a "chickensh*t" like in your original message. - clarkjohnsen 10:41:56 07/12/05 (3)
- Too close to bat guano, and we know for whom that's reserved. - Audiophilander 15:26:42 07/12/05 (2)
- NOTE BENE: This is the writer's fourth version of this particular post. Would someone please inform him... - clarkjohnsen 08:08:35 07/13/05 (1)
- "I hate reading drafts." - Don't worry about it, you're too old to be concerned about conscription. - Audiophilander 08:56:19 07/13/05 (0)
- Ummmm... - Audiophilander 22:56:58 07/10/05 (2)
- A film should stand ENTIRELY on its own merit! - RGA 11:44:44 07/11/05 (1)
- "If I read the book I would not need to see the film..." - It's a classic! I thought that everyone had read WoTW... - Audiophilander 17:01:02 07/11/05 (0)