In Reply to: Re: Name some of these "film historians and critics" that like this mainstream mediocrity. posted by rico on July 16, 2005 at 07:43:07:
Yes and he's thre most notworthy film critic in the history of film criticism. But he's hated cause he's made something of himself (if you're a nobody writing for an underground newspaper then you're a serious art historian because you can write in PHD E's (piled higher and deeper) but if you're famous then you're a sell-out or other such idiocy.You can look and see for yourself which critics liked it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Name some of these "film historians and critics" that like this mainstream mediocrity. - RGA 11:09:30 07/16/05 (10)
- Re: The most noteworthy film critic in film criticism? - Gee LP 00:51:50 07/17/05 (9)
- Re: The most noteworthy film critic in film criticism? - RGA 10:53:25 07/18/05 (4)
- Re: RGA, just say, "Ebert is the best film critic in MY opinion!" - Gee LP 18:50:19 07/18/05 (3)
- Re: Whoops! My bad on the Pulitzer! - Gee LP 19:02:21 07/18/05 (2)
- Re: Whoops! My bad on the Pulitzer! - RGA 23:32:51 07/18/05 (1)
- Re: Leonard Maltin? Do I have a recommendation for you! - Gee LP 00:17:20 07/19/05 (0)
- A great post. There's more diplomacy there than I'm capable of! -nt- - Donald 04:38:49 07/17/05 (3)
- Re: There is so much more to film criticism than I know! - Gee LP 11:40:24 07/17/05 (2)
- That is well said - Victor Khomenko 18:58:34 07/17/05 (1)
- Re: Thanks, that is why I am here! - Gee LP 19:23:17 07/18/05 (0)