In Reply to: Haven't seen the others but Me And You And Everyone We know Is Not Good posted by Daryl Zero on August 2, 2005 at 19:32:06:
I don't think her character needs to be a good performance artist for the movie to be good and what some may see as a fatal attraction (huh? she had zero malice) stalker I saw as a person who felt a connection and was willing to risk being vulnerable to explore it. And I didn't see John Hawes character as insane I saw him as desperately trapped in a situation (his wife leaving) that he didn't know how to deal with and he did something crazy. I thought his performance in that scene was excellent and that he was living with the aftermath of having done something crazy for most of the rest of the movie.I also didn't find any scene particulalry disturbing or sickly sweet and thought the overall tone was very hopeful.
"Where are we going? And what am I doing in this hand basket?"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well... different strokes, I guess. - sjb 22:24:01 08/02/05 (5)
- Don't You Think . . . - Daryl Zero 13:11:29 08/03/05 (3)
- Re: Don't You Think . . . - sjb 19:09:04 08/04/05 (0)
- Re: Indie movie cliches? - Dave-A 07:42:02 08/04/05 (1)
- Would you rather see the wildly creative Dukes of Hazzard? - Daryl Zero 08:20:46 08/04/05 (0)
- I liked it too - tunenut 10:07:10 08/03/05 (0)